Life sciences · Journal article
Methods in Molecular Biology
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Predicting the binding specificity between T-cell receptors (TCRs) and peptide-major histocompatibility complexes (pMHCs) represents one of the most challenging problems in computational immunology. Accurate prediction of these interactions is essential for advancing immunotherapy development, neoantigen vaccine design, and understanding adaptive immune responses. This chapter provides a comprehensive methodological guide to computational approaches for TCR-pMHC binding prediction, with particular emphasis on protein language model-based methods that have transformed the field since 2022. We describe the theoretical foundations, input requirements, output specifications, and practical implementation details for major prediction tools, including TCR-ESM, NetTCR-2.2, ERGO-II, pMTnet, ATM-TCR, and emerging approaches utilizing ESM-2, tcrLM, and graph neural networks. Additionally, we provide detailed protocols for data preparation, model execution, and result interpretation, along with essential notes addressing common challenges and best practices for method selection based on specific research objectives.