Life sciences · Journal article
Medical Sciences · October 27, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Background/Objectives: Nutritional depletion and systemic inflammation are common in patients living with obesity undergoing metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) and may influence the risk of early postoperative complications. Composite indices derived from routine blood tests—combining markers of protein/immune reserve and inflammatory burden—offer an inexpensive means of preoperative risk stratification, but their comparative performance in MBS has not been well defined. The primary objective is to compare the prognostic performance of seven preoperative indices for early postoperative complications after MBS; the secondary objective is to estimate and rank the incremental prognostic value of each index over baseline clinical risk factors. Methods: This protocol describes a single-centre retrospective cohort study of approximately 700 consecutive adults who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, one-anastomosis gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy or single-anastomosis sleeve-ileal bypass, including revisional procedures, between 1 January 2023 and 28 June 2026; data extraction will begin only after submission of this protocol. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), C-reactive protein-to-Albumin Ratio (CAR) and Glucose-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (GLR) will be calculated from complete blood count, albumin, C-reactive protein and fasting glucose values. The last preoperative sample is the exposure; early postoperative values (postoperative days 1–3) will be examined in a separate exploratory landmark analysis. The primary outcome is any complication of Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher within 30 days of surgery; readmission within 30 days of surgery and prolonged hospital stay will be analysed as secondary healthcare-utilisation outcomes. The indices will be compared by their optimism-corrected incremental discrimination over a baseline clinical model, using penalised logistic regression with bootstrap internal validation and calibration assessment. Conclusions: This protocol outlines a pragmatic approach to comparing seven low-cost, routinely available nutritional–inflammatory and inflammatory indices for risk stratification before MBS. Indices showing promising performance will require external, ideally multicentre, validation before they can be considered for clinical decision making.