Life sciences · Journal article
Physics in Medicine and Biology · October 5, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Objective. Stereotactic body radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (SBRT-SIB) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is constrained by the proximity of serial gastrointestinal organs at risk (OARs). Conventional intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) relies on a limited number of fixed beam angles, which may restrict dose shaping around these critical structures. This study evaluated whether non-coplanar spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc-4π) could improve OAR sparing while preserving robust target coverage. Approach. 10 patients with LAPC were retrospectively selected in this study. For each patient, SBRT-SIB plans were generated using conventional IMPT and SPArc-4π. Plan robustness was assessed across 21 uncertainty scenarios. Target coverage, conformity, OAR doses, estimated delivery time, and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for four gastrointestinal endpoints were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Main results. SPArc-4π maintained target coverage comparable to IMPT, with similar clinical target volume (CTV) and boost-volume coverage, while CTV conformity improved with SPArc-4π (conformity index: 0.50 vs. 0.56; p = 0.02). SPArc-4π significantly reduced maximum dose (Gy(RBE)) to the stomach (30.01 to 24.53), duodenum (35.14 to 33.14), bowel (32.60 to 28.91), and spinal cord (15.38 to 5.58; all p ≤ 0.01). Predicted toxicity decreased across all four gastrointestinal endpoints: gastric bleed risk decreased from 8.19% to 6.15%, grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity from 3.91% to 3.81%, ulceration/perforation from 0.03% to 0.01%, and diarrhea from 24.14% to 22.34% (all p ≤ 0.005). All plans met robustness criteria. The main trade-off was delivery efficiency, with SPArc-4π requiring approximately 2-3 minutes longer delivery time than IMPT. Significance. SPArc-4π provides a promising proton planning strategy for pancreatic SBRT-SIB by preserving robust target coverage while improving gastrointestinal organ sparing and reducing predicted toxicity. These findings support further investigation of SPArc-4π for safer dose escalation in LAPC.