Life sciences · Review
Journal of Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences · October 25, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Review.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Background Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in the management of head and neck cancer but frequently results in acute and chronic oral complications that adversely affect dental hard tissues, salivary gland function, pulpal vitality, and oral rehabilitation. These changes increase the risk of radiation caries, restorative failure, pulpal pathology, and osteoradionecrosis, posing significant challenges to restorative and endodontic management. This narrative review aimed to provide an overview of the biological effects of radiotherapy on oral tissues and to discuss current preventive, restorative, and endodontic strategies for managing patients with irradiated tissues. Methodology A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar till July 2026. Relevant literature was critically interpreted and narratively synthesized. Results Current literature supports comprehensive pre-radiotherapy dental assessment, meticulous oral hygiene, lifelong fluoride therapy, regular follow-up, and conservative management to preserve natural dentition whenever feasible. Nonsurgical endodontic treatment is generally preferred over extraction in appropriately selected cases to reduce the risk of osteoradionecrosis. Contemporary advances, including bioactive restorative materials, photobiomodulation, digital workflows, and regenerative endodontics, show promise; however, evidence supporting their routine clinical use in irradiated patients remains limited and largely experimental. Conclusion Successful dental rehabilitation following head and neck radiotherapy requires a multidisciplinary, prevention-oriented approach supported by individualized treatment planning and long-term maintenance. Although emerging technologies may improve future patient care, further high-quality clinical studies are required before widespread clinical implementation can be recommended.