Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 15, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Can deep learning translate physical fields governed by fundamentally different equations? We address this question by introducing Cross-Physics Mapping (CPM), an operator-learning framework for mappings between heterogeneous physical domains. We formulate sufficient conditions for such mappings through compatible latent representations and propose a dimensionless scaling principle that aligns the characteristic evolution scales of the source and target systems without assuming their dynamical equivalence. As a representative test, paired diffusion and wave fields are generated independently from their respective parabolic and hyperbolic equations while sharing the same latent geometry, material heterogeneity, excitation, and dimensionless scale. Seven architectures-ResUNet, DeepONet, Fourier, latent, wavelet, U-shaped, and Galerkin neural operators-are evaluated for both diffusion-to-wave and wave-to-diffusion mappings. The results reveal a strong directional asymmetry. Diffusion-to-wave reconstruction is more challenging because it requires recovering wavefront, phase, and time-of-flight information attenuated by diffusion; U-NO performs best in this direction, achieving a relative $\ell_2$ error of $0.307$ and an $R^2$ of $0.905$. Wave-to-diffusion mapping is considerably more stable, with GNO attaining a relative $\ell_2$ error of $0.154$ and an $R^2$ of $0.935$. Neural operators generally outperform the conventional convolutional baseline, highlighting the nonlocal nature of cross-physics transformations. These findings demonstrate that deep learning can establish useful mappings between distinct physical modalities on a shared latent manifold, while the achievable accuracy remains fundamentally constrained by the direction-dependent information content of the governing physics.