Life sciences · Journal article
Gels · November 5, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Biopolymer-based hydrogels offer adaptable platforms for localized cancer therapy by regulating administration, tissue retention, payload protection, and therapeutic release. This review critically examines polysaccharide-, protein-, peptide-, and polynucleotide-based hydrogels, relating polymer composition, crosslinking, network architecture, swelling, degradation, and payload interactions to pharmaceutical and biological performance. Physical, chemical, enzymatic, and ionic gelation strategies are evaluated alongside diffusion-, swelling-, affinity-, and degradation-controlled release and their mathematical interpretation. Macrogels, microgels, nanogels, and hybrid systems are compared according to administration route, disposition, and oncology-relevant function. The review further distinguishes local placement, passive accumulation, ligand-mediated cellular interactions, and endogenous or externally triggered release. Applications in chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, hyperthermia, and phototherapy are assessed across colorectal, gastric, liver, pancreatic, and breast cancers. Marketed devices, patented technologies, clinically evaluated systems, and regulatory considerations are also examined. Despite extensive preclinical development, translation remains constrained by polymer variability, incomplete pharmaceutical characterization, sterilization and scale-up challenges, uncertain degradation and clearance, and limited clinically representative evidence. Progress will depend on clinically defined product design, reproducible manufacturing, quantitative disposition and safety assessment, and demonstration of meaningful benefit over existing therapeutic or procedural alternatives.