Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Frontiers in Psychology · September 21, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Self-report scales dominate adolescent mental-health assessment but depend on symptom recognition and disclosure. Participant-generated language offers a complementary window on affective processes, yet most evidence comes from adult, English-language, community, or social-media data, leaving clinically referred adolescents and structurally different languages such as Turkish understudied. Sentence-completion tasks are clinically familiar but interpreted qualitatively, yielding no quantitative index. In this multicenter cross-sectional study, 445 clinically referred adolescents (aged 10–18 years; 55.1% girls) from three Turkish child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinics completed a 24-item sentence-completion task, the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI), and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Completions were analyzed with a Turkish Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) dictionary at whole-response and thematic levels. Because anger and sadness words are nested within the broader negative-emotion category, negative-emotion language was separated into anger, sadness, and other negative emotion, so that each coefficient referred lexical items. Partial correlations and hierarchical regressions related these components, positive-emotion language, and first-person singular reference to symptom severity, controlling for age, sex, word count, and study site, with false-discovery-rate correction. Negative-emotion language was positively associated with depressive symptoms, total difficulties, emotional symptoms, and conduct problems ( r = 0.25 to 0.35), whereas positive-emotion language showed inverse associations. After decomposition, the affective-language block explained 8.1–13.3% of incremental variance, and anger and sadness each contributed beyond general negative tone. The anger coefficient exceeded the sadness coefficient in the conduct-problems model but not in the depressive or emotional-symptoms models. First-person singular reference, which included Turkish verbal morphology and tracked referential context, was unrelated to symptom severity, and no cognitive-process, third-person, or social-content category yielded a detectable association in exploratory screening. The negative-emotion–depression association was of comparable magnitude at all three sites, and the findings persisted after diagnostic adjustment and without the minimum word-count criterion. Affective language in brief Turkish sentence-completion responses therefore tracked dimensional symptom burden, while the absence of a first-person effect under a morphology-informed operationalization underscores the need for cross-linguistically valid measures of self-reference. Automated analysis offers a way of rendering a clinically familiar task quantifiable, as a complementary research measure rather than a standalone diagnostic tool.