Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 6, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Reliable uncertainty estimation is important for deploying evaluation metrics in real-world settings, where both input ambiguity and domain shifts are common. In this work, we propose an uncertainty-aware extension of the BEiTScore image captioning metric, producing conformally calibrated confidence intervals alongside alignment scores. Our approach models predictive distributions over human judgments, enabling both accurate scoring and principled uncertainty quantification in a single forward pass. We evaluate our BEiTScore++ metric across multiple benchmarks with human-annotated ratings, showing that it preserves the ranking correlation of BEiTScore, while producing intervals whose width tracks the prediction error more closely than Monte Carlo dropout on most benchmarks. The estimated uncertainty also grows under image degradation and on out-of-domain artwork images, making BEiTScore++ a practical tool for uncertainty-aware evaluation of image-caption alignment.