Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 3, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models are widely deployed in modern machine learning. However, few convergence guarantees exist for gradient-based training of MoEs: the objective is nonconvex, and even simple mixtures trap first-order methods in spurious local optima. We analyze a canonical gated mixture featuring linear experts and a gate induced by Gaussian clusters in the input space, and give, to our knowledge, the first global convergence guarantee for jointly training the gate and the experts of such a model by gradient EM on its likelihood. Given a logarithmic overparameterization relative to the true number of experts $m$, gradient EM converges from randomly initialized gates and least-squares-initialized experts to any prescribed accuracy in polynomially many iterations, under a separation condition on the gate centers. Our analysis establishes a gradient-dominance inequality for the coupled dynamics by decoupling the loss into per-cluster subproblems. Empirical results validate the predicted $m\log m$ phase transition and suggest that the least-squares warm start required by our analysis is not needed in practice: randomly initialized experts perform nearly as well. We also find that leaving the mixing weights unconstrained concentrates routing onto the true number of experts, whereas load-balancing penalties spread it, so that the fitted model can be pruned to a fraction of its width without loss of accuracy.