Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 25, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
We study geometric moment contraction (GMC) of the constant-parameter stochastic Nesterov recursion \[ Y_k=Θ_k+β(Θ_k-Θ_{k-1}),\qquad Θ_{k+1}=Y_k-γG(Y_k,X_{k+1}). \] Under mean strong monotonicity and stochastic $L^p$ Lipschitz continuity, an explicit Perron comparison proves synchronous $L^p$ contraction when $βγL_p<(1-β)(1-q_{γ,p})$. This direct criterion includes infinite-variance gradients for $1<p<2$, but its small-step regime requires $β<μ/(μ+L_p)$. A complementary power-Lyapunov argument establishes a positive, generally much smaller, step-size interval for every fixed $β<1$ and every $p>1$, using only a finite $p$th gradient moment. At $p=2$, a simpler explicit certificate gives \[ 0<γ<\frac{2μ(1-β)^2}{L_2^2(1-β+2β^2)}. \] Its quadratic high-momentum scaling is a limitation of the chosen metric, not a sharp stability boundary. We quantify this loss, provide a general mean-only quadratic $S$-procedure, and exploit endpoint Lyapunov inequalities under stronger samplewise sector information. Verified endpoint certificates can be orders of magnitude less conservative than the explicit metric.