Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 2, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Distillation has become a core primitive of large language model training, but its properties are not yet well understood. We take an entropic perspective, studying how the entropy of the student depends on the data and the divergence that define the distillation objective. We prove that forward KL inflates the entropy of the student above that of the teacher. Since cross-entropy training is a special case, this yields an identity that we verify quantitatively in pretraining and supervised finetuning. Other divergences come with no such guarantee: reverse KL deflates entropy until the gap between student and teacher gets too large, and interpolating between the two changes entropy smoothly early in training but abruptly at convergence. The lower entropy of on-policy distillation comes from token-level reverse KL, not from on-policy sampling. The divergence therefore acts as an implicit entropy regularizer, whose role is clearest in self-distillation: as conditioning on privileged information deflates entropy, the divergence hyperparameters that work best are those that compensate for it.