Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 5, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
sEMG Foundation Models aim to learn general purpose representations over diverse subjects and recording conditions that boost performance on a variety of downstream tasks. However, existing evaluations make it difficult to discern whether pretraining alone is sufficient to combat the cross-subject overfitting which makes machine learning on sEMG so challenging. We conduct a systematic evaluation of three sEMG foundation models across three gesture classification datasets under both intra-session and inter-subject splits, using three fine-tuning strategies designed to isolate the contribution of pretraining. We find that pretraining boosts performance when train and test samples are drawn from the same recording session, but this benefit largely disappears under inter-subject evaluation. In low subject count datasets, pretraining provides little to no benefit and classical ML baselines match or exceed foundation model performance.