Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
PLOS One · September 17, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Background Limited research exists on the implementation of nutrition care pathways to provide dietetics care in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery, particularly from the patient perspective. This study aimed to understand patients’ experiences and perceptions of dietetics care provided via a nutrition care pathway, both before and after curative intent surgery. The secondary aim was to explore patients’ experiences of self-managing nutrition throughout their treatment trajectory and the impact on quality of life. Methods This was a single-centre, prospective phenomenological study. Patients undergoing curative neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer were invited to participate in two semi-structured interviews: 1) in the period between completion of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery; 2) at 3 months post-surgical discharge. Questions pertaining to experiences and perspectives regarding dietetics intervention, nutritional status, symptoms, and quality of life were asked as per the interview schedule. Data were analysed and coded thematically using a phenomenological approach. Results Thirteen participants were included (12 with oesophageal cancer and one with gastric cancer; mean age 63 years, 62% male). Four main themes were identified: 1) lived experiences of nutritional changes during treatment and recovery; 2) perceptions of nutrition and role of the dietitian; 3) feeding tubes and oral supplements as “the necessary evil”; and 4) impact of treatment and nutritional changes on daily life. Conclusions Participants experienced significant nutritional challenges throughout the treatment trajectory, greatly impacting on daily life and psychosocial wellbeing. Participants found the dietetics care provided under the nutrition care pathway to be highly beneficial and acceptable, and dietitians were deemed an essential resource. The findings suggest that intensive, individualised nutrition care pathways, including oral and enteral supplementation, would be beneficial in similar clinical contexts, with peer support identified as an area for further resourcing and research.