Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Annals of Surgical Oncology · October 6, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Background Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is associated with significant morbidity and can result in financial hardship, yet this aspect of survivorship remains understudied. This study evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of financial toxicity (FT) among patients following esophagectomy. Methods Patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2016 and September 2022 were surveyed about demographic, financial, and employment history. Financial toxicity was measured by using the validated COST survey. Multivariate analyses identified predictors of FT. Results Of 370 patients contacted, 159 (43%) completed the survey. Median age was 65.3 years; 82.4% were male. Following therapy, 44.7% reported decreased work hours or stopped working entirely. Insurance was employer-based for 50.3%, while 40.6% had Medicare. Financial toxicity was reported by 37.1%. Risk factors included larger household size (odds ratio 2.3), low credit score (odds ratio 13.2), while high income and active retirement were protective. Conclusions More than a third of esophagectomy patients were found to have FT. Those with poor baseline financial health or disrupted employment were most vulnerable and may benefit from early financial counseling and support interventions.