Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 31, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Algebraic multigrid (AMG) methods are widely used for solving large sparse linear systems, but their efficiency depends strongly on interacting setup and solve parameters. Effective parameter choices typically depend on the problem. We develop a phase-aware online autotuning method for hypre's BoomerAMG to reduce cumulative time-to-solution over sequences of related linear systems. A LinUCB-based contextual bandit selects mixed-type parameters for AMG hierarchy construction using a shared cost model over PDE descriptors and configuration encodings. A recursive LSTDQ controller uses residual and timing observations to estimate the AMG solve time within each attempt and adapt relaxation weights between multigrid cycles. Both learners update from ongoing solves without offline pretraining. Across grids of sizes $40^3$, $60^3$, and $80^3$, the joint autotuning method reduces total runtime, including recurring learner computation, by 36.1-43.3% for diffusion problems and 19.8-31.0% for diffusion-advection problems over sequences of 5000 linear systems, relative to the reference BoomerAMG default configuration. On a variable-flow diffusion-advection benchmark comprising 30,000 systems on a $60^3$ grid, 2 systems fail to converge with joint autotuning, compared with 1677 for the reference configuration, under their respective attempt budgets.