Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Cancers · October 14, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Introduction: Despite their benefit, current anti-EGFR therapies are limited by narrow efficacy profiles due to dose-limiting toxicities. This phase 2 open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABT-806, an EGFR-targeting antibody that is tumor specific, in patients with advanced EGFR-expressing tumors including head and neck cancers (H&NC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of other sites. Methods: Patients with advanced H&NC (cohort A) or SCC of other sites (cohort B) were enrolled in the study. ABT-806 was administered as monotherapy at a dose of 24 mg/kg intravenously using a twice weekly dosing schedule until unacceptable toxicity and/or evidence of disease progression. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0; tumor response was assessed using the Response Evaluation criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. EGFR status was assessed with mAb806 and EGFRvIII immunohistochemistry and correlated with outcomes. Results: ABT-806 was well tolerated with no grade 3+ treatment-related AEs. Disease stabilization was observed in two patients (14%) and for a median duration of 19.5 weeks. This included one patient from cohort A and one patient from cohort B. Progression-free survival and overall survival was not significantly different between the two cohorts. Conclusions: Although clinical activity was limited in this small, heavily pre-treated, and biomarker-unselected population, ABT-806 demonstrated an excellent safety profile with minimal classical EGFR-related toxicity. These findings support the development of more tumor-specific EGFR antibodies for use, particularly in combinatorial regimens.