Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 27, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
We consider the centralized traffic routing (CTR) problem, where a central planner assigns routes to origin-destination (OD) vehicle flows to minimize congestion-dependent segment cost. Prior work formulates CTR efficiently as a mixed-integer linear program (MILP), but scaling this formulation to the full road network is computationally prohibitive within an operational time budget. Bounded Routes and Smart Routes speed up optimization using precomputed reduced networks; however, these methods do not account for vehicle information within each OD flow. Motivated by this gap, we propose a learning-based urban network reduction approach. A dedicated graph neural network (GNN) first scores road segments for each OD flow using the road network and vehicle-flow information. Highly ranked segments are then incorporated into complete OD routes, and the original segment-flow MILP is solved on the resulting reduced road network. The GNN thus guides the reduction of the road network, while the solver enforces feasibility and determines the routing. Experiments on four real urban networks -- Prague-Dejvice, London, New York, and Sydney -- show that the proposed approach achieves the smallest relative objective difference to the $30$-second full-graph reference in every city under both traffic regimes. Averaged across cities, this difference is more than six times lower than that of the best competing method. Moreover, traffic simulation results show that the optimization gains of the proposed method lead to more efficient routing, with the highest aggregate arrival rate and a competitive trip duration per arrival percentage point.