Life sciences · Journal article
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cases · October 23, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Postoperative empyema with persistent air leak remains a challenging complication after pulmonary resection. Fenestration may be required in refractory cases but is highly invasive, particularly in high-risk patients. We report two patients successfully treated with prolonged open drainage using a large-sized cut tube without fenestration and propose clinical criteria for selecting suitable candidates. A 72-year-old man with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis developed Aspergillus empyema with persistent air leak after bullectomy for pneumothorax, and a 71-year-old man developed empyema with persistent air leak after left lower lobectomy and lingulectomy with bronchoplasty for lung cancer. Both were initially treated with closed chest drainage and antimicrobial therapy. On days 23 and 32, respectively, after infection was controlled, drainage volume decreased to < 50 mL/day, the empyema cavity became localized, and residual lung expansion remained stable despite persistent air leakage, the drainage tubes were cut and shortened to convert them to open drainage. CT confirmed that both cavities were anatomically separated from the pulmonary artery and other major hilar vessels. Both patients were subsequently managed as outpatients, and the empyema cavities gradually became obliterated by granulation tissue, allowing tube removal without fenestration. No recurrence occurred during 2 and 4 years of follow-up, respectively. Prolonged open drainage with a large-sized cut tube may provide a less invasive alternative to fenestration in selected patients with postoperative empyema and persistent air leak. Suitable candidates may be characterized by controlled infection, low drainage volume, a localized empyema cavity, stable residual lung expansion, and anatomical separation from major hilar vessels.