Loading
Pregnancy Preterm / Glow! Group Prenatal Care / Premature Birth · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 17, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a registry record for a completed randomized trial comparing group prenatal care with wrap-around services to individual prenatal care with CPSP services among 678 low-income pregnant individuals in California. No results are reported in this registry entry; the evidence base remains incomplete pending publication of outcome data.
Interventional, Randomized, Parallel, Single masking, Health Services Research purpose. Premature Birth, Pregnancy Preterm, Prenatal Stress, Depression, Anxiety, Depression, Postpartum, Satisfaction, Patient, Health Problems in Pregnancy; Female; accepts healthy volunteers. Intervention: Glow! Group Prenatal Care; Individual Prenatal Care- CPSP. Compared with: Individual Prenatal Care with California Department of Public Health Comprehensive Perinatal Services Program (CPSP). n = 678. 2 sites: United States.
This is a registry record for a completed randomized trial comparing group prenatal care with wrap-around services to individual prenatal care with CPSP services among 678 low-income pregnant individuals in California. No results are reported in this registry entry; the evidence base remains incomplete pending publication of outcome data.
Results are not posted in this registry record; no efficacy or safety data are available.
If results favour group prenatal care, this trial may support redesign of prenatal services for low-income populations. Clinicians should await publication of preterm birth rates, depression scores, and care experience measures before interpreting impact.
Registry record of a completed randomized comparative effectiveness study with hard clinical outcomes (preterm birth) and validated mental health measures, but no results posted; cannot assess efficacy or safety until outcome data are published.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
If results favour group prenatal care, this trial may support redesign of prenatal services for low-income populations. Clinicians should await publication of preterm birth rates, depression scores, and care experience measures before interpreting impact.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04154423). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: University of California, San Francisco. Recruitment status: COMPLETED. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 678 participants (ACTUAL). Conditions: Premature Birth, Pregnancy Preterm, Prenatal Stress, Depression, Anxiety, Depression, Postpartum, Satisfaction, Patient, Health Problems in Pregnancy. Interventions: OTHER: Glow! Group Prenatal Care; OTHER: Individual Prenatal Care with CPSP. Primary outcome measures: Changes in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score , Collected from study enrollment to three months postpartum; Person-centered Prenatal Care , Collected during third trimester; Preterm Birth , 0-12 weeks after delivery. Brief summary: This is a randomized comparative effectiveness study of two forms of enhanced prenatal care among 674 Medi-Cal eligible pregnant individuals in Fresno, California. The goal is to see whether group prenatal care with wrap around services versus individual prenatal care supplemented by services covered by the California Department of Public Health Comprehensive Perinatal Services Program (CPSP) results in less depression and anxiety, and more respectful, more person-centered maternity care and lower rates of preterm birth.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.