Loading
Life sciences · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · September 14, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Interventional Study.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04613193). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Henrik Wiggers. Recruitment status: COMPLETED. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 60 participants (ACTUAL). Conditions: Aortic Valve Stenosis, Hypertension,Essential, Heart Failure. Interventions: OTHER: Blood presssure reduction. Primary outcome measures: Change in LV mass , Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 12 months treatment; Change in aortic valve CT calcium volume and aortic peak gradient , Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2-3 years treatment; Clinical composite endpoint: , Will be evaluated after an expected average of 7-13 years of treatment. Brief summary: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of strict blood pressure control versus conventional care in patients with asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic valve stenosis. The study is a randomized (1:1), open label, controlled intervention trial. Hypothesis: 1. Strict BP control for 12 months reduces the progression of LV remodelling compared to conventional treatment. 2. Strict BP control for 2 years reduces the increase in aortic valve calcification and LV remodelling compared to conventional treatment. 3. Strict BP reduction for up to 10 years reduces the need for aortic valve replacement and cardiovascular events compared to conventional care.