Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Cardiovascular Ultrasound · October 4, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) are widely used for cardiac surveillance in patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic cancer therapy. While GLS is more sensitive for detecting early myocardial dysfunction, the relationship between EF and GLS in routine clinical practice remains incompletely characterized, and discordance between these parameters may complicate clinical interpretation. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 117 oncology patients undergoing serial echocardiographic assessment at baseline, early follow-up (6-12 weeks), and short-term follow-up (3-6 months). EF was measured by biplane Simpson's method, and GLS by speckle-tracking echocardiography as absolute values. EF deterioration was defined as a ≥ 10% absolute reduction or EF < 53%, while GLS deterioration was defined as a ≥ 15% relative reduction in absolute GLS magnitude. Concordance between EF and GLS deterioration was assessed, using Cohen's kappa and McNemar's test. RESULTS: Mean EF and GLS values remained stable (EF p = 0.124; GLS p = 0.803). EF deterioration occurred in 32 patients (27.4%), and GLS deterioration in 25 patients (21.4%). Discordance was common, with isolated GLS deterioration in 17 patients (14.5%), and EF deterioration without GLS decline in 24 patients (20.5%), representing discordance in 41% of patients. Agreement was poor (κ = 0.05), and McNemar's test was not significant (p = 0.27). ΔGLS showed a weak association with ΔEF (r = 0.19, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Although systolic function remained stable overall, clinically relevant deterioration occurred in a subset. Frequent EF-GLS discordance highlights their complementary but non-interchangeable roles in cardio-oncology surveillance.