Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 17, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Action chunking is widely used for action generation and execution in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies, yet existing approaches commonly use a fixed action horizon. During a rollout, different task stages may require different levels of action continuity, control precision, and closed-loop feedback, making a fixed horizon unable to accommodate changing control requirements. We propose \textbf{GeoAAC}, a geometry-based adaptive action chunking method for flow-based VLA policies that adjusts the action horizon according to the reliability of the current action prediction. We show that the geometry of Flow Matching denoising trajectories provides process-level information for characterizing prediction reliability, with geometric variation across action prefixes remaining positively correlated with predictive uncertainty. GeoAAC uses this prefix-wise geometry to construct a horizon-wise geometric profile and adaptively determine the action horizon from a single generation without additional training. Experiments with GR00T N1.5 and π0.5 on LIBERO, LIBERO-Pro, RoboCasa365, and real-world manipulation tasks show consistent improvements over fixed-action-horizon baselines and existing adaptive methods, including up to 8.7 percentage points in simulation and an increase in average real-world success rate from 53.3\% to 74.4\%.