Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Motivated by the computational challenges of large-scale Cox regression, we study stochastic minimization of LogSumExp objectives over large sets. Mini-batch normalizer estimates generally yield biased gradients. We instead use a softplus surrogate that introduces one auxiliary scalar per normalizer and admits unbiased single-sample gradients. For smooth convex LogSumExp objectives, we prove an $O(T^{-1/2})$ averaged objective bound, improving the previous $T^{-1/4}$ analysis. With a strongly convex regularizer on the original variable, we also obtain a last-iterate squared-error rate of $\widetilde{O}(T^{-1})$ without strong convexity in the auxiliary variables. For Cox regression, the normalizers are defined over nested risk sets. We exploit this structure by grouping neighboring failures and sharing one auxiliary variable per group. The resulting compressed objective admits uniform score and curvature bounds that control the errors from grouping and softplus approximation. Together with the general optimization result, these bounds give a mean-square rate of $T^{-4/5}$, up to logarithmic factors, relative to the full Cox solution. The compressed estimator also matches the full estimator's asymptotic distribution. Experiments on synthetic and real survival datasets with slowly decreasing risk sets show a favorable performance relative to stochastic baselines.