Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 26, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Coordinating many miniature robots in a confined arena, with no leader, central planner, or global map, is a core challenge for swarm robotics. As the swarm grows denser, collision avoidance becomes the limiting factor, and the number of safely coexisting robots depends on the formulation of the inter-robot safety constraint. We present a distributed predictive flocking controller in which each robot solves its own nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) problem, optimizing swarm cohesion and alignment costs, inter-robot and obstacle safety, and a task objective, while exchanging only predicted trajectories with local neighbors. Within this generalized controller architecture, solved in real time, we compare six barrier and control-barrier-function (CBF) safety formulations on a digital twin of an open-source vibration-driven bristlebot in a $0.64\,\mathrm{m^2}$ arena. A look-ahead discrete-time CBF performs best overall, with the fewest collisions and the widest inter-robot margins across nearly every swarm size tested. We deploy it on phototaxis, phototactic orbiting, and cohesion without a stimulus tasks, using swarm sizes starting from ten robots and up to the geometric packing limit. The swarm holds well: collisions stay low in small swarms, rising steeply as the packing limit approaches, while coordination and cohesion degrade gently rather than collapsing. The swarm is found not to trade safety for order, keeping both across the confined arena, with local alignment high at every swarm size.