Life sciences · Journal article
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · October 14, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a heterogeneous and rapidly changing biological pool derived from malignant cells, normal tissues, and hematopoietic cells. The abundance and molecular composition of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are determined not only by tumor burden but also by tissue architecture, vascular access, cell-death programs, chromatin organization, nuclease processing, systemic clearance, treatment exposure, and clonal evolution. These biological determinants shape the mutation, methylation, fragmentation, nucleosomal, and temporal features exploited by contemporary liquid-biopsy assays. Accurate clinical interpretation therefore requires both sensitive detection and reliable source attribution, particularly the distinction of tumor-derived variants from constitutional germline alterations and clonal hematopoiesis. In this review, we integrate the biological origins and processing of plasma cfDNA with analytical strategies for low-tumor-fraction detection and critically evaluate the evidence supporting postoperative molecular residual disease (MRD), recurrence surveillance, treatment-response assessment, resistance monitoring, and ctDNA-guided therapy across solid tumors. Particular emphasis is placed on distinguishing prognostic validity, treatment-predictive value, and demonstrated clinical utility. Current evidence is strongest in colorectal cancer and, more recently, ctDNA-selected urothelial cancer, whereas routine ctDNA-directed intervention in resected non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer remains insufficiently validated. By linking cfDNA biology to an explicit hierarchy of clinical evidence, this review defines both the established applications and the major limitations that must be addressed before broader implementation of ctDNA-guided precision oncology.