Life sciences · Review
Cancer Letters · November 4, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Review.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by progressive skeletal muscle wasting that diminishes quality of life, limits responses to anticancer therapies, and increases mortality. Although excessive protein degradation has traditionally been viewed as a primary driver of muscle loss, cachectic muscle undergoes broader disruption of proteostasis involving protein turnover, organelle quality control, stress adaptation, metabolism, and regenerative capacity. Accumulating evidence suggests that diverse tumor- and host-derived signals converge on interconnected transcriptional networks that coordinate these processes. Rather than functioning independently, transcription factors integrate inflammatory, metabolic, hormonal, and cellular-stress signals to generate catabolic, stress-responsive, anabolic, and regenerative programs whose effects vary with disease stage and cellular context. Importantly, these transcriptional responses are not uniformly pathological but can represent causal, adaptive, or compensatory programs. Epigenetic, post-transcriptional, and post-translational mechanisms provide additional layers that shape the activation and magnitude of these transcriptional programs. Emerging single-cell and multi-omic approaches have further revealed myofiber- and cell-specific regulatory networks underlying the heterogeneous response of skeletal muscle to tumor growth. In this review, we argue that transcriptional reprogramming represents a central integrative mechanism through which diverse catabolic signals remodel skeletal muscle proteostasis, and we examine how network-level regulation contributes to muscle adaptation and wasting in cancer cachexia. Defining which regulatory programs are causal, compensatory, or maladaptive may reveal more precise biomarkers and therapeutic targets for preserving skeletal muscle mass and function in patients with cachectic cancer.