Loading
Lung Cancer · Observational Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 12, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a recruitment-phase observational registry record evaluating implementation and effectiveness of the Pink and Pearl lung cancer screening campaign at a single health system site. No results have been posted; the study uses mixed methods to assess baseline prevalence, screening uptake at 3 and 6 months, and implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness).
Observational. Lung Cancer, Cancer of the Lung; age from 18 Years; accepts healthy volunteers. Intervention: Participants - scheduled for mammography and eligible for L…; Providers. n = 279. 1 site: United States.
This is a recruitment-phase observational registry record evaluating implementation and effectiveness of the Pink and Pearl lung cancer screening campaign at a single health system site. No results have been posted; the study uses mixed methods to assess baseline prevalence, screening uptake at 3 and 6 months, and implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness).
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
This is a registry record for an observational study still recruiting; no results are posted, making it an early-stage implementation evaluation of feasibility and acceptability.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06898333). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Washington University School of Medicine. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Study type: OBSERVATIONAL. Enrollment: 279 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Lung Cancer, Cancer of the Lung. Primary outcome measures: Prevalence of LCS-eligible women who opt-in to, and successfully, complete LCS mammography and opt-in to lung cancer screening , At baseline; Number of women screened for LCS , At 3 months; Number of women screened for LCS , At 6 months; Feasibility of Pink and Pearl project , At 6 months; Acceptability of Pink and Pearl project , At 6 months; Appropriateness of Pink and Pearl project , At 6 months. Brief summary: The investigators proposal is ripe for executing as the investigators seek to leverage this "natural experiment" initiated by the BJC health system to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pink \& Pearl Campaign as an implementation strategy to promote lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake among LCS-eligible women undergoing mammography at BJC West County. This evaluation is grounded in the Integrated Screening Action Model that depicts individual- and environmental-level influences on the screening behavior process. Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, which combines both quantitative and qualitative approaches, the research questions and specific aims for this proposal are to: a) evaluate the baseline prevalence of LCS among LCS-eligible women; b) assess whether the Pink \& Pearl Campaign increases referrals and uptake/ completion of LCS among LCS-eligible women undergoing screening mammography; and c) evaluate individual and environmental factors influencing LCS uptake, and implementation outcomes of the campaign. These implementation outcomes will help identify whether the campaign was put in place successfully or not. This proposal will inform strategies for integrating cancer screening programs to improve poorly performing programs like LCS.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.