Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 21, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
One of the enduring challenges in online platforms is recommendation. Both communities and advertisers face difficulties in analyzing complex user behavior, identifying habits and evolving preferences, and providing timely recommendations that are relevant to user interests. In particular, point of interest recommendation poses the additional challenge of identifying the factors that influence user behavior, capturing user tendencies, and generating accurate, personalized recommendations for each individual. In this work, we propose SOAR, a Social and Opinion Aware Recommendation model that incorporates both the user's friendship network and textual reviews to assess whether a location is suitable for a specific user, with a particular emphasis on the sentiment of shared reviews. Experimental results in real-world datasets demonstrate that incorporating reviews into the recommendation process improves the precision of the recommendation.