Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Cancers · September 18, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Obesity influences breast cancer risk, progression, and therapeutic response through endocrine, inflammatory, metabolic, stromal, and vesicular mechanisms. Circulating and extracellular vesicle (EV)-associated microRNAs are attractive liquid biopsy candidates; however, in obesity-associated breast cancer, they should not be interpreted as tumor-only biomarkers. This narrative review analyzes circulating/EV-miRNAs as mixed host–tumor signals and separates association-based biomarker evidence from functional EV-mediated transfer. We performed a narrative and integrative review of studies on miRNA biogenesis, circulating miRNA transport, EV biology, adipose tissue dysfunction, adipose-tumor communication, biomarker development, therapy response, and methodological reporting standards. The current literature is read along two independent axes: human relevance and source attribution, from non-breast models to obesity-stratified human cohorts, and mechanistic causality, from association only to EV-level function, miRNA-level function, and causality with rescue; clinical validation is treated as a separate qualifier rather than as the top of a single scale. For example, EV-let-7a in overweight/obese breast cancer patients mainly supports an obesity-stratified biomarker candidate. Breast adipose tissue-derived EV cargoes enriched in miR-155-5p, miR-10a-3p, and miR-30a-3p provide stronger functional support for metabolic reprogramming, whereas EV-associated miR-221/222 has mediator-level evidence in endocrine resistance but is not obesity specific. Conclusions: The main contribution of this review is an operational interpretation framework in which circulating miRNAs are evaluated according to probable source, evidence level, and clinical purpose. Future studies should report EV workflow quality, sample type, hemolysis and platelet control, normalization strategy, external validation, tumor subtype, and obesity phenotyping beyond BMI, including waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio, insulin resistance, diabetes, menopausal status, and inflammatory markers.