Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Healthy Jurnal Inovasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan · November 2, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Post-therapy whole body scan (WBS) I-131 acquisition parameters such as scan speed are adjusted according to the patient's radiation exposure rate to optimize clinical workflow efficiency. This study aims to determine the correlation between exposure rate, scan speed, and planar whole body image quality during post-therapy WBS I-131 at the Nuclear Medicine Installation of RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung. This quantitative analytical retrospective study with an observational approach utilized secondary protocol data from 30 thyroid cancer patients acquired between January and February 2026. Image quality was visually evaluated by a nuclear medicine specialist using a 1–5 visual grading scale, and the data were analyzed using the Spearman rank correlation test (p < 0.05). The results demonstrated a significant negative correlation between scan speed and image quality (r = -0.389; p = 0.034), alongside a significant positive correlation between exposure rate and scan speed (r = 0.438; p = 0.015). Conversely, no statistically significant correlation was identified between patient exposure rate and final image quality (r = -0.010; p = 0.959).