Life sciences · Journal article
Journal of Translational Medicine · September 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Translational interpretation of targeted-therapy response in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging because conventional biomarkers incompletely explain sensitive and resistant states, particularly for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. We tested whether post-treatment-associated, organoid-line-specific regulatory-network changes could add interpretable context to conventional biomarker analyses in patient-derived CRC organoids. We analyzed organoids from 10 patients treated with five targeted agents. Whole-exome sequencing (WES), paired RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) before and 8 h after drug exposure, and organoid-line-specific regulatory-network analysis were used to compare conventional genomic and expression-based readouts with network-level response features. Selected network-derived genes were examined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) follow-up. To address the small cohort size, empirical response categories, and network-threshold dependence, we also performed internal robustness analyses using ΔECv threshold sensitivity, full-cohort support mapping across response groups, and exact same-size subset permutation. Mutation, copy-number alteration, expression-only clustering, and differential-expression analyses provided only partial stratification. Genomic features were directionally informative in selected settings, including SMAD4 alteration in LDN-193189 response and KRAS status in cetuximab resistance, but did not fully resolve discordant samples such as KRAS-mutant cetuximab-sensitive C45. Organoid-line-specific regulatory-network analysis identified heterogeneous post-treatment-associated rewiring. LDN-193189 yielded a 15-edge common sensitivity network that retained 12 edges at a more stringent ΔECv threshold, whereas cetuximab yielded a smaller two-edge stringent core when all organoids meeting the predefined high-sensitivity threshold were included. Full-cohort support analysis showed heterogeneous network support among moderate-response and resistant organoids, indicating that the common subnetworks should not be interpreted as validated monotonic classifiers across all response categories. qPCR follow-up provided node-level support for selected network-derived genes. Organoid-line-specific regulatory-network analysis identified interpretable candidate targeted-drug response-associated subnetworks in patient-derived CRC organoids beyond conventional genomic and expression-only comparators. These findings support an exploratory translational network-medicine framework for studying therapeutic heterogeneity in patient-derived CRC organoid drug-response studies.