Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 2, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Stationarity rewards memory, but after a change the same history can mislead. We ask when forgetting should be permitted. E-process-authorized Thompson sampling (e-ATS) gives each arm full-history and discounted Beta states. An anytime-valid e-process first authorizes the discounted state, then a reversible relevance score controls its influence. Before authorization, e-ATS exactly follows optimistic Thompson sampling (OTS). Under a Beta-Bernoulli prior-predictive stationary model, e-ATS's probability of ever departing from OTS is at most the chosen $α_E$, without fitted thresholds. Relative to e-ATS, removing authorization increased mean normalized dynamic pseudo-regret by $38.4\%$ on the registered suite but reduced it by $7.5\%$ on the literature-derived replay suite. Therefore, evidence controls when adaptation begins, not whether it always helps.