Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 23, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems have become increasingly widespread, aiming to support drivers, reduce workload, and improve traffic safety. However, many systems are rarely used because their behavior feels unnatural and does not match individual driving behavior. The growing availability of large-scale, real-world human driving data enables more human-like and driver-individual assistance functions. This paper formulates the adaptation of Adaptive Cruise Control parameters as a driver-individual scenario-to-scenario transport problem, transforming controller parameters from one driving context to another. Using flow matching, we train a generative model to predict the target-scenario behavior of previously unseen drivers from only a few demonstrations in a source scenario. We compare the approach with a linear parameter-shift baseline and evaluate flow-matching variants incorporating driver-consistent coupling, driver embeddings, and classifier-free guidance based on driving profiles extracted from trajectory data using a variational autoencoder.