Life sciences · Journal article
International Journal of Hyperthermia · September 14, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
BACKGROUND: Thermal ablation is a minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa). MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) enables precise, temperature-controlled therapy, but its 3 cm ablation radius may limit coverage in large prostates or capsule-adjacent tumors. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (nADT) may improve treatment feasibility by reducing prostate and tumor size. METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm pilot study (NCT05917860), 15 treatment-naïve patients with organ-confined, intermediate-risk ISUP 2-3 PCa and at least one biopsy-concordant PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesion received 3-month nADT with degarelix before whole-gland TULSA. Multiparametric MRI was performed at baseline and monthly thereafter to assess prostate and lesion volumes, tumor-capsule relationship, and urethra-capsule distance. RESULTS: < 0.001). Capsule bulging resolved in four of seven patients, and urethra-capsule distance decreased to ≤ 30 mm in all six patients with a baseline distance > 30 mm. CONCLUSION: Short-term nADT with degarelix was associated with significant changes in prostate and tumor morphology. Future studies should determine whether these changes improve TULSA outcomes.