Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 2, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Multimodal graph foundation models (MGFMs) seek to learn generalizable representations from large-scale graphs with heterogeneous node modalities. However, real-world Multimodal-Attributed Graphs (MAGs) often contain incomplete node attributes, limiting the scale and diversity of available pretraining corpora. Besides, existing MGFMs primarily incorporate graph topology as structural context, overlooking its role in guiding multimodal binding and shaping a unified representation space. To address these challenges, we propose GraphBind, a topology-driven approach that uses graph topology to bind rich modality information into a unified shared space. GraphBind is motivated by the stability of graph topology, which provides structural references and complementary semantic information for multimodal binding. Concretely, GraphBind uses topology to organize self semantics and reliable neighborhood semantics into a global shared space that integrates structure and semantics, and adapts this space to discriminative and generative tasks through lightweight interfaces. Extensive experiments against 11 representative baselines demonstrate that GraphBind achieves leading performance on both discriminative and generative tasks, with relative improvements of up to 28.1% over the strongest baseline.