Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 14, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
3D Gaussian language fields provide an explicit, spatially grounded representation for 3D visual question answering (VQA), but their dense semantic features can require tens of thousands of embeddings per scene, resulting in substantial storage, memory, and inference costs. We investigate how much of this representation is actually necessary for downstream reasoning. Starting from a full embedding representation, we systematically sparsify its semantic embeddings, including the previously underexplored regime below a single image-equivalent block down to 8 visual tokens. We compare random, geometric, semantic, and joint spatial-semantic selection strategies and introduce an object-based sparsification method that distributes the token budget across detected object instances while retaining background context. Experiments on ScanQA and MV-ScanQA reveal substantial redundancy in dense Gaussian language fields. Strong VQA performance is retained with only a few hundred semantic embeddings, corresponding to less than 1% of the original representation. Object-based selection performs well relative to others, with only modest observed changes down to 256 tokens. At this budget, SparseTalk retains 0.80% of SplatTalk's 32,076-token inference input and 0.332% of the mean 77,207-Gaussian dense field, increasing inference throughput while reducing decoded-feature memory 125-fold.