Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Internal and Emergency Medicine · September 25, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Lebanon entered the 2024 armed conflict with health, environmental, and social systems already weakened by successive crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, prolonged economic collapse, and the 2020 Beirut Port explosion. This narrative review aimed to synthesize evidence on the documented and anticipated effects of the conflict on public health, healthcare services, the environment, food security, education, and progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Evidence was drawn from peer-reviewed studies and reports issued by governmental institutions and international organizations. Documented damage to hospitals and primary healthcare facilities, together with disruptions to medical supply chains, affected routine and emergency care and complicated the management of chronic diseases. Population displacement, overcrowding, and interruptions to essential services also increased the risk of infectious disease transmission and created conditions that may facilitate the spread and emergence of antimicrobial resistance, particularly in displaced and otherwise vulnerable populations. Concurrently, explosive weapons, fires, and infrastructure damage affected air, water, soil, agricultural land, and ecosystems. These environmental and agricultural impacts created plausible pathways linking conflict-related damage to food security, livelihoods, and long-term population health, although direct epidemiological evidence remains limited. Overall, the conflict generated interconnected pressures across health, environmental, and social systems and compounded pre-existing vulnerabilities. Coordinated recovery efforts should restore healthcare capacity, protect environmental and agricultural resources, strengthen surveillance, and support essential social services to reduce long-term harm and promote sustainable recovery.