Older Adults / Enhanced usual care / Heart Failure · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 13, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a planned 2-arm randomized controlled trial comparing N-of-1 trial methodology with enhanced usual care to guide beta-blocker titration in older adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. No results are reported in this registry record; the study is currently enrolling by invitation and outcomes will be measured at 120 days.
Interventional, Randomized, Parallel, Single masking, Health Services Research purpose. Heart Failure, Beta-blocker, Older Adults; age from 60 Years. Intervention: N-of-1 Trials. Compared with: Enhanced usual care — Active Comparator. n = 50. 1 site: United States.
This is a planned 2-arm randomized controlled trial comparing N-of-1 trial methodology with enhanced usual care to guide beta-blocker titration in older adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. No results are reported in this registry record; the study is currently enrolling by invitation and outcomes will be measured at 120 days.
No results or outcome data are reported in this registry record; efficacy, safety, and tolerability are unknown.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
This is a registry record describing a planned interventional trial with no results posted; it reports study design and planned enrollment only, making it preliminary evidence pending outcome data.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07489352). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Brigham and Women's Hospital. Recruitment status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 50 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Heart Failure, Beta-blocker, Older Adults. Interventions: BEHAVIORAL: N-of-1 trials; BEHAVIORAL: Enhanced usual care. Primary outcome measures: Maximum beta-blocker dose achieved , 120 days. Brief summary: In this study we seek to understand whether N-of-1 trials using a crossover withdrawal/reversal design with as many 2-week periods can be used to identify the highest tolerated beta-blocker dose for patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). To achieve this objective we will conduct a 2-arm randomized controlled trial of 50 participants, comparing intervention(N-of-1 trials) to enhanced usual care. For participants randomized to the intervention, we will use collect data via validated patient-reported outcomes and then display this data on a visualization tool. This tool was iteratively developed for N-of-1 trials with patient input - a comparison of how the patient felt on different beta-blockers. If well-tolerated and the participant agrees to continue with dose escalation based on review of their data, the participant will take a higher dose for the next 2-week period; and the study team will again collect data on how they feel during this time. This approach of sharing end-of-period data with participants and subsequently escalating the dose (based on the participant's decision) for another 2-week period will continue until the guideline-directed target dose is reached or until the participant feels that their symptoms are limiting dose escalation. The N-of-1 intervention is purposefully structured to allow the participant to participate in as many periods (and as many dose combinations) as they wish until they are confident that they have reached their highest tolerated dose. This adaptive design for N-of-1 trials is intended to be patient-centered and patient-driven. We will also conduct brief semi-structured interviews with intervention participants. Participants randomized to enhanced usual care will not have access to patient-reported outcomes or the data visualization tool. Since attention can affect outcomes, we will "enhance usual care" by conducting phone calls at the same frequency as the intervention group.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.