Life sciences · Journal article
Open Forum Infectious Diseases · September 9, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Background Infectious disease test results frequently finalize after hospital discharge, and many are clinically actionable. Standardized workflows for reviewing these results remain limited. Although pharmacist-led culture follow-up is well established in emergency departments, evidence evaluating inpatient transitions-of-care models is sparse. This study assessed the impact of a pharmacist-led service on outpatient antimicrobial appropriateness and clinical outcomes. Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective pre–post study at a community hospital comparing patients discharged with pending infectious disease test results before and after service implementation. The intervention included thrice-weekly review of finalized results, clinical assessment, prescriber communication, outpatient prescription changes, and patient counseling. The primary outcome was appropriate outpatient antimicrobial therapy 7 days after discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to appropriate therapy among patients requiring prescription modification and 30-day infection-related outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for urine culture source, discharge service, and inpatient infectious diseases consultation. Time-to-therapy analyses used Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards. Results Among 191 patients (93 pre-intervention; 98 post-intervention), appropriate antimicrobial therapy at 7 days increased from 69% to 92%. Adjusted analyses showed a 21.3% higher predicted probability of appropriate therapy (95% CI, 10.6–32.0). Among patients requiring prescription changes (n=63), median time to appropriate therapy improved from 7 to 4 days, with a fivefold higher rate of achieving appropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 5.09; 95% CI, 2.13–12.18). Thirty-day outcomes were similar between groups. Conclusions A pharmacist-led service improved antimicrobial appropriateness and accelerated transitions to appropriate therapy, supporting pharmacist-driven follow-up as an effective stewardship strategy.