Life sciences · Journal article
Journal of Surgical Oncology · October 29, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
ABSTRACT Background Multidisciplinary management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has evolved rapidly over the past decade, guided by data from multiple prospective clinical trials. Methods Changes in treatment of cT3‐4 or N+ rectal cancer at a comprehensive cancer center between 2015 and 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Results Of 1121 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, 793 (71%) underwent active surveillance and 328 (29%) underwent surgery within 3 months. Treatments whose use increased from 2015 to 2023 included TNT with consolidation chemotherapy (from 10% to 81%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (from 13% to 21%), immunotherapy or targeted therapy (from 0% to 10%), and oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil in combination with oxaliplatin (from 4% to 56%). Among patients who received TNT, nonoperative management with sustained clinical complete response rose from 38% to 50%. With more patients undergoing nonoperative management, the rate of pathologic complete response decreased from 22% to 8.3%. Robotic assistance was used in 88% of surgeries. Conclusions The adoption of new diagnostic and treatment paradigms allows for longer intervals until surgery, more frequent use of active surveillance, and higher rates of organ preservation without compromising safety or oncologic outcomes.