Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 23, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Embodied reinforcement learning (RL) improves model capabilities with a pipeline of environment simulation, action generation, and model updates. These stages show heterogeneous CPU and GPU demands, making efficient resource utilization difficult. Recent systems overlap rollout (simulation and generation) with training for efficiency, but exclusive GPU allocation and synchronized barrier in rollout still leave substantial hardware resource waste. In this paper, we present EBRL, an asynchronous embodied RL training system with two core techniques. The asynchronous pipelined scheduler overlaps rollout and training, pipelines simulation and generation across environment groups, and carries out each environment independently, eliminating synchronization stalls. The fine-grained resource manager pools CPU cores and GPU streaming multiprocessors, and uses stage profiles and runtime feedback to adjust resource quotas and batch sizes to meet the shifting demands among stages. We implement EBRL on RLinf and evaluate it with four embodied policies and four simulation benchmarks across heterogeneous GPU testbeds. Experiments show that EBRL achieves 1.30-3.47 times the end-to-end rollout throughput and 2.5 times of training convergency compared to the SOTA embodied RL systems.