Life sciences · Journal article
Microbiology Spectrum · October 6, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
ABSTRACT Treatment of healthcare-associated infections is becoming increasingly challenging due to rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR). As clinical microbiology and public health continue to transition toward whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for outbreak detection, diagnostics, and surveillance, the ability to accurately predict antimicrobial resistance from genomic sequence data will become crucial. In this study, in silico antimicrobial resistance prediction with the Staramr tool was refined from whole-genome sequencing data for four top-priority healthcare-associated bacteria: carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli, carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Isolates ( n = 4,876) were collected in Canada within two national surveillance programs: the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program and the Canadian Ward Study. Broth microdilution was used as the gold standard to evaluate the performance of Staramr. The average sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of categorical antimicrobial resistance prediction compared to broth microdilution were 90.8%, 90.1%, and 92.4% for E. coli ( n = 1,095); 87.7%, 91.7%, and 90.6% for K. pneumoniae ( n = 687); 95.5%, 98.9%, and 96.3% for methicillin-resistant S. aureus ( n = 2,150); and 95.4%, 97.9%, and 97.2% for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium ( n = 944). Additionally, this internal tool refinement identified areas of improvement for antimicrobial resistance prediction. The average sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of antimicrobial resistance prediction were high (>90%) for most combinations of antimicrobials and species that were evaluated. While AMR prediction from WGS was very promising, it did not correlate well with current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints for non-susceptibility for some antimicrobial-organism combinations. As in silico prediction of antimicrobial resistance has been improved in this study through tool refinement, it shows future promise for molecular methods to complement phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing. This will allow for more precise tracking of the molecular epidemiology of resistance and cost savings when isolates are being sequenced for strain typing. IMPORTANCE In silico prediction of antimicrobial non-susceptibility in priority healthcare pathogens is becoming an important area of study due to the rising rates of resistance and the transition to whole-genome sequencing. To evaluate whether Staramr, an antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prediction tool, can reliably detect non-susceptibility in four top-priority healthcare-associated bacteria, we performed a validation study on a large Canadian clinical data set, which included carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Compared to traditional antimicrobial susceptibility testing, we found that Staramr was reliable for predicting non-susceptibility for most combinations of antimicrobials and organisms; however, some combinations require additional data on genetic mechanisms of resistance for accurate prediction. Additionally, this study identified areas for refinement for current drug-gene interpretation keys. Thus, this tool refinement study advances the use of genotypic methods of AMR prediction for high-priority healthcare pathogens.