Depression · Journal article
Ibro Neuroscience Reports · July 31, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This cross-sectional study of 83 RRMS patients with mild/moderate disability found that neurological disability (EDSS) and education level were the strongest predictors of cognitive outcomes, while most peripheral oxidative stress markers showed no significant correlation with clinical measures. The design cannot establish causality and the null findings for oxidative stress limit the utility of these biomarkers in this population.
Cross-sectional observational study. RRMS patients with EDSS ≤ 3 (mild/moderate disability); mean age 32.65 ± 8.05 years; 77.1% female.. n = 83.
EDSS negatively associated with SDMT cognitive score (OR=0.95; p=0.02) and PASAT score (OR=0.92; p=0.01) in binary logistic regression In multivariable linear regression, EDSS correlated with SDMT (β=-0.23, p=0.047) and PASAT (β=-0.36, p=0.002) Education level correlated with SDMT (β=0.29, p<0.001) and PASAT (β=0.27, p=0.01)
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
In RRMS patients with mild/moderate disability, clinicians should recognise that neurological disability level and education are established predictors of cognitive outcomes. Peripheral oxidative stress markers showed limited clinical utility in predicting cognitive or motor outcomes in this population, though the single-centre cross-sectional design limits generalisability.
Cross-sectional study in a single cohort with modest sample size examining associations between oxidative stress markers and clinical outcomes in RRMS; descriptive findings lack a comparator group and most oxidative stress correlations were not significant.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
In RRMS patients with mild/moderate disability, clinicians should recognise that neurological disability level and education are established predictors of cognitive outcomes. Peripheral oxidative stress markers showed limited clinical utility in predicting cognitive or motor outcomes in this population, though the single-centre cross-sectional design limits generalisability.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
Background. This study aimed to comprehensively examine the interplay between demographic factors, peripheral oxidative stress markers, disability, depressive symptoms, cognitive outcomes, and hand dexterity in Relapsing-remitting Multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients with mild/moderate disability.Methods. In this cross-sectional study, RRMS patients with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)≤ 3 underwent assessments of cognitive function (Symbol Digit Modalities Test [SDMT], Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test [PASAT-3]), depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II [BDI-II]), hand dexterity (Nine-Hole Peg Test [9HPT]), and neurological disability (EDSS). Oxidative stress markers (malondialdehyde [MDA], total antioxidant capacity [TAC], superoxide dismutase [SOD], catalase activity [CAT], glutathione peroxidase [GPx], and reduced glutathione [GSH]) were also measured.Results. The studied cohort comprised 83 patients (77.1% females; mean age: 32.65 ± 8.05 years). In addition to negative association between the EDSS and cognitive outcomes in binary logistic regression analysis (SDMT: OR=0.95; p = 0.02; PASAT: OR=0.92; p = 0.01); neurological disability also correlated with cognitive scores in multivariable linear regression (SDMT: β=-0.23, p = 0.047; PASAT: β=-0.36, p = 0.002). Education also correlated with the cognitive outcomes (SDMT: β=0.29, p < 0.001; PASAT: β=0.27, p = 0.01). MDA was associated with abnormal cognitive function (SDMT≤44; OR: 2.98 (95%CI: 1.33, 6.66) but correlation between these outcomes was no longer significant in multivariable linear regression (β=-0.21; p = 0.051). Except for a marginal correlation between EDSS and MDA (β=0.21, p = 0.04) and between 9HPT-M and TAC (β=0.26, p = 0.01), there was no significant finding regarding the correlations between the clinical and laboratory outcomes.Conclusion. Even in patients with mild/moderate disability, EDSS and education level were emerged as the strongest predictors of cognitive outcomes in RRMS.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.