Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Cancers · October 9, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) accounts for over 80% of esophageal cancer cases globally. Lymph node status is the strongest determinant of survival after resection, yet occult disease is found in about 17% of patients classified as node-negative. We developed a postoperative model estimating the probability of lymph node metastasis (LNM) from the resection specimen, combining nuclear features with clinicopathological variables. Methods: Of 477 consecutive ESCC patients undergoing radical esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy, 416 were analyzed (LNM 217, 52.2%). Nuclear features were extracted from H&E whole-slide images (20×) by QuPath optical-density detection; LASSO logistic regression selected 17. A nomogram combining the pathomics score with age, sex, tumor location, pT category and grade was validated by 10-fold cross-validation (out-of-fold, OOF) and applied without refitting to 101 patients from another institution. Results: OOF AUC was 0.821 (95% CI 0.779–0.858) for the combined model, versus 0.791 (clinical) and 0.762 (pathomics alone). The pathomics score remained an independent predictor (adjusted OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.80–3.39; p < 0.001). LNM prevalence rose across tertiles (15.8%, 55.1%, 85.6%; p < 0.001). Among 199 node-negative patients, high pathomics risk predicted worse 3-year overall survival (77.2% vs. 94.3%; p = 0.005) and progression-free survival (75.5% vs. 88.9%; p = 0.007). Externally (n = 101; LNM 24.8%), AUCs were 0.812, 0.801 and 0.697, and adding pathomics did not significantly improve discrimination. Conclusions: Within the development cohort, pathomics added modest but significant incremental value and identified node-negative patients at elevated risk. Because the model requires the resection specimen, it cannot guide preoperative treatment selection. External validation did not confirm incremental value: the clinical component; the pathomics signature did not.