blood sampling / Sepsis · Observational Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 14, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a registry entry for an active observational study recruiting sepsis patients to characterize immune phenotypes (immunotypes) at three timepoints and correlate them with short- and long-term clinical outcomes. No results are posted; the record describes study rationale, design, and planned analyses only. Clinicians and researchers should monitor for results reporting.
Observational. Sepsis; age from 18 Years. Intervention: blood sampling. n = 400. 1 site: Netherlands.
This is a registry entry for an active observational study recruiting sepsis patients to characterize immune phenotypes (immunotypes) at three timepoints and correlate them with short- and long-term clinical outcomes. No results are posted; the record describes study rationale, design, and planned analyses only. Clinicians and researchers should monitor for results reporting.
Primary outcomes are immunotype classification measures; clinical benefit or harm has not been evaluated. Long-term clinical outcomes (infection, cardiovascular disease, mortality) are stated as study aims but no prospective endpoint definitions or statistical analysis plan is disclosed in this record.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
This is an active observational registry study with no results yet posted; it describes planned enrollment and immunophenotyping outcomes but carries no outcome data, effect estimates, or clinical evidence.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07273344). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Radboud University Medical Center. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Study type: OBSERVATIONAL. Enrollment: 400 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Sepsis. Interventions: OTHER: blood sampling. Primary outcome measures: Classification of hospitalized sepsis patients into distinct immunotypes. , Day 0 (within 48 hours of intensive care unit admission or start of sepsis); Classification of hospitalized sepsis patients into distinct immunotypes. , Day 3 (defined as 3 days after day 0); Classification of hospitalized sepsis patients into distinct immunotypes. , At hospital discharge.. Brief summary: Sepsis occurs when an infection, caused by bacteria, a virus, or a fungus, enters the body and throws the immune system out of balance. Instead of protecting the body, the immune response may become too strong and start damaging healthy organs, or it may become too weak and fail to control the infection. Both situations can be life-threatening. Even people who survive sepsis may experience long-term health problems, such as new infections, heart and blood vessel diseases, or early death. This study aims to better understand how the immune system behaves during and after sepsis. We believe that there are different types of immune responses in sepsis, called immunotypes. We will identify these immunotypes by examining substances in the blood and changes in immune cells. We will then study which immunotypes help protect patients and which may cause short- or long-term harm. Understanding these immunotypes may make it possible in the future to quickly determine what type of immune response a patient with sepsis has. This could help doctors choose the best treatment for each individual patient. A total of 400 patients with sepsis from the intensive care unit will take part in this study. We will collect blood samples at several time points and gather information about their health. Participants will be followed from their intensive care admission until one year after they return home.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.