Loading
Life sciences · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · November 6, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Interventional Study.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07921446). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Institute of Mental Health, Singapore. Recruitment status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 140 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Depression, Anxiety. Interventions: BEHAVIORAL: Lifestyle psychoeducation intervention; BEHAVIORAL: Personalized digital psychoeducation intervention on emotion regulation. Primary outcome measures: Depression, Anxiety, and Stress as Assessed by DASS-21 , From enrollment to 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up; Global Emotion Dysregulation as Assessed by the DERS-SF , From enrollment to 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up; Ecological Assessment of Momentary Emotion Dysregulation , From baseline to the end of intervention at 4 weeks; Rumination as Assessed by the RRS , From enrollment to 3-month (post-intervention) follow-up. Brief summary: The present study aims to determine whether a personalized digital psychoeducation intervention (active intervention group) is more effective than self-monitoring of one's mood (control group) in reducing emotion regulation difficulties, depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms in at-risk youths exposed to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). We hypothesized that the active intervention group will be associated with less severe emotion regulation difficulties, depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms than the control group at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up. This study will recruit a total of N = 140 youths (age 15 to 35 years) with ACEs and randomized into either the active intervention group (n = 70) or the control group (n = 70). Participants will complete study measures at baseline, post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. The study team has expertise in youth mental health. This study is feasible and will be completed within 4 years. Our findings will support the development and implementation of an efficacious, cost-effective, personalized and scalable intervention to reduce poor mental health and prevent the onset of mental disorders among at-risk youths. Our intervention has significant potential to improve population health, quality of life, functioning, morbidity, and mortality, as well as alleviate the healthcare burden associated with ACEs.