Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 15, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
The choice of Riemannian metric can strongly influence the convergence of gradient-based optimization over covariance matrices. Euclidean, Bures-Wasserstein and affine-invariant metrics are common choices, but their relative effectiveness depends on the objective. We introduce a two-parameter family defined by $X^{p}LX^{q}+X^{q}LX^{p}=U$, solved for $L$ at each tangent vector $U$, that contains all three as exact members, at $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(1,1)$, and extends past them. We treat the choice of member as a particular way of preconditioning for a given problem. To this end, we analyze the conditioning of the Riemannian Hessian at the solution. We show that it obeys a lower bound that depends on $(p,q)$ only through the exponent $r=p+q$. When the Euclidean Hessian is a pure power that mixes no eigendirections, the member $p=q=r/2$ attains that bound, and a closed-form criterion identifies the other members that do. We discuss ways to tune $r$ for a given problem. Experiments on real covariance data confirm the predicted conditioning and the benefit of tuning $r$. A task covariance example shows a further gain from tuning the shape.