Loading
Pediatric ALL / Pediatric eCART / Sepsis · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 13, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a registry record for a recruiting implementation study of pediatric eCART, a clinical decision support tool for identifying high-risk pediatric patients with ALL or sepsis. The study compares 3 years of pre-implementation data against 2 years of post-implementation data on in-hospital mortality and ICU-free days, but no results are reported in this registry entry.
Interventional, Single Group, Open label, Health Services Research purpose. Pediatric ALL, Sepsis; to 17 Years. Intervention: Pediatric eCART. Compared with: Retrospective standard care prior to eCART implementation. n = 30,000. 1 site: United States.
This is a registry record for a recruiting implementation study of pediatric eCART, a clinical decision support tool for identifying high-risk pediatric patients with ALL or sepsis. The study compares 3 years of pre-implementation data against 2 years of post-implementation data on in-hospital mortality and ICU-free days, but no results are reported in this registry entry.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
Once results are reported, this study will inform whether implementation of a pediatric decision support tool reduces mortality and increases ICU-free days in high-risk pediatric populations. Clinicians should not interpret this registry record as reporting any efficacy or safety data.
This is a registry record for a recruiting interventional study with no reported results; it describes planned enrollment and outcome measures only, making it an early-phase implementation evaluation with no evidence of effect yet available.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Once results are reported, this study will inform whether implementation of a pediatric decision support tool reduces mortality and increases ICU-free days in high-risk pediatric populations. Clinicians should not interpret this registry record as reporting any efficacy or safety data.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06771830). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: University of Wisconsin, Madison. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 30000 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Pediatric ALL, Sepsis. Interventions: DEVICE: Pediatric eCART. Primary outcome measures: In Hospital Mortality , assessed through hospital stay (typically up to 5 days on average, but may be over 60 days); Intensive Care Unit (ICU) free days , up to 28 days. Brief summary: This is a study comparing 3 years of retrospective data (pre-implementation) to 2 years of prospective data after the implementation of a pediatric version of Electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (pediatric eCART), a clinical decision support (CDS) tool that uses electronic health records (EHR) to identify patients with high risk for life threatening outcomes. Up to 30,000 encounters with pediatric patients will be assessed. Acceptability of the pediatric eCART intervention will also be measured from pediatric nurse clinicians.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.