Loading
Life sciences · Review
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · October 9, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Review.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Purpose Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity remains an important complication in patients with breast cancer receiving systemic therapy, and effective preventive strategies remain limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the cardioprotective effects of beta-blockers in anthracycline-treated breast cancer patients. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, Pubmed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane were systematically searched, and the protocol was preregistered on PROSPERO (CRD420261366946). The primary outcome was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), while the secondary outcome was E/A ratio. Certainty and robustness of the evidence were assessed using GRADE approach and trial sequential analysis (TSA). A meta-analysis was performed using R version 4.6.0, and heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. Results A total of 8 studies including 772 patients were analyzed. Beta-blocker therapy was associated with significant preservation of LVEF vs. placebo or standard care (MD, 2.85; 95% CI, 0.58–5.12; p = 0.02; I 2 95%). No significant improvement was observed for E/A ratio (MD, 0.10; 95% CI, −0.12 to 0.31; p = 0.25; I 2 69.7%). However, sensitivity analysis resulted in a statistically significant pooled effect (MD = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.29, p = 0.01; I 2 = 35.9%). TSA showed that the Z-curve crossed the monitoring boundaries favoring beta-blockers for LVEF; however, the required information size (RIS = 1,785) was not reached. Conclusion Beta-blockers were associated with preservation of systolic function in anthracycline-treated breast cancer patients. However, no significant benefit was observed for E/A ratio, and evidence regarding diastolic protection remains inconclusive. Larger, high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings. Systematic Review Registration identifier CRD420261366946.