Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 6, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in high-risks decision-making systems across domains such as healthcare, finance, and the judicial system. As reliance on predictive models grows, so does the demand for Explainable AI (XAI) to ensure transparency, trust, and interpretability. However, existing XAI approaches often fail to present explanations in a format accessible to domain experts, limiting their practical utility. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a bridge between complex models and end-users, offering natural language explanations. Yet, their use introduces new risks, including hallucinated outputs and lack of source traceability. To address these challenges, we propose a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that not only combines standard predictive models with XAI techniques but also incorporates a Retrieval-Augmented Generation module as an interactive enhancer. This module grounds explanations in verified medical knowledge, reformulates technical outputs into a human-like format, and enables users-such as clinicians-to actively query the system. By fostering an interactive, human-in-the-loop environment, our approach empowers domain experts to explore model decisions, contextualize explanations, and build trust in AI-assisted diagnostics. The study concludes with preliminary experiments validating the proposed methodology.